I'm a general contractor who handled an insurance job. The insurance company made out a $30,000 multi-party check made payable to my company, clients (husband and wife), and bank ABC (which held an interest due to a home equity loan). Husband and wife endorse the check and got bank ABC to endorse, and I endorsed with my business name. I proceeded to deposit it into my business account at bank XYZ, which I did in person with the bank manager due to the size and the multi-party endorsements. I even had the clients go with me in case there was an issue. The manager reviewed everything, accepted it for deposit and said the funds would be accessible subject to a 5 business day hold.
After waiting 5 business days, checking with the insurance company that the check had actually cleared (which it did in 2 days), and verifying my balance on line I started to write checks for at least a portion of the available funds. After the 8th day I start getting over a dozen NSF notices! When I contacted the my bank they said that their fraud department had frozen my funds. The fraud department claimed they had the right to do this because they "didn't know the endorsers on the check".
My bank then proceed to then wait another week and then snail mailed a check for $30,000 back to the insurance company! This was even after I had the insurance company contact them directly and tell them they didn't want the money back, that I was the contractor and everything was on the up and up. I then had to wait an additional week for the insurance company to reissue another check. My bank then had the unmitigated nerve to demand over $800 for bounced check fees. (Needless to say I deposited the check at another bank and closed that particular account, but they still want $800, plus I'm still out from the fees owed to those I wrote the checks to, plus embarrassment of giving my contractors bad checks)
I'm not an attorney but I don't see how from my limited understanding of the UCC and Regulation CC a bank has any kind of right to do that. They could have refused to accept the check in the first place. They could have waited a day and sent it back, OK, but to actually present the check and get paid on it, then freeze my days latter funds seems absolutely corrupt. And who are they to then send the funds back to the maker of the check? Those were my funds once I deposited the check, not the banks and the not maker. If I tried sending $30,000 of the bank's money to a 3rd party I'd be sitting in a federal cell right now.
I've already reviewed this with an attorney (who admits he's not a expert in banking) and he's astounded at the banks behavior as I am. Question I have is, is there anything the bank can use to justify its actions?